Mode of Program Participation
Academic Scholarship
Participation Type
Paper
Presentation #1 Title
RIPARIAN BUFFER WIDTH AND LANDOWNER PREFERENCE IN MACON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Presentation #1 Abstract or Summary
When aggregated, how individual landowners decide to manage their land can have dramatic implications for stream health regionally. In this study, I interviewed 31 western North Carolina landowners who had participated in a riparian buffer restoration program more than a decade ago. I compared the landowners’ reported preferences for managing their riparian zones to the current average width of their riparian buffer. The results of this study show that even among those who invested in riparian buffer restoration work on their property, lack of understanding of how or why to maintain a riparian buffer as well as individual preferences for narrower buffers often outweighed the goals of the restoration. Narrower average buffer widths were generally attributed to management that met a personal aesthetic preference or allowed visual or physical access to the river. Among landowners who actively managed their land, the most successful buffers were under conservation easement.
At-A-Glance Bio- Presenter #1
Anne Chesky Smith is the Executive Director of the Swannanoa Valley Museum & History Center in Black Mountain, NC. She recently completed a MA in Environmental Anthropology at the University of Georgia.
RIPARIAN BUFFER WIDTH AND LANDOWNER PREFERENCE IN MACON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
When aggregated, how individual landowners decide to manage their land can have dramatic implications for stream health regionally. In this study, I interviewed 31 western North Carolina landowners who had participated in a riparian buffer restoration program more than a decade ago. I compared the landowners’ reported preferences for managing their riparian zones to the current average width of their riparian buffer. The results of this study show that even among those who invested in riparian buffer restoration work on their property, lack of understanding of how or why to maintain a riparian buffer as well as individual preferences for narrower buffers often outweighed the goals of the restoration. Narrower average buffer widths were generally attributed to management that met a personal aesthetic preference or allowed visual or physical access to the river. Among landowners who actively managed their land, the most successful buffers were under conservation easement.
