•  
  •  
 

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.18590/mjm.2015.vol1.iss1.5

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose

Appalachians exhibit high rates of chronic disease-related behaviors which might improve with heightened health consciousness. Knowing one's family history can be an important health maintenance tool. Appalachians' health attitudes are shaped in large, closely knit extended families in which matriarchs play central roles. We sought assistance from West Virginian grandmothers in a family medicine practice in engaging their extended families with their genogram to assess the impact on family members' level of health consciousness.

Methods

The family physician identified West Virginian grandmothers in his practice. We sent each of them invitations to participate, along with their extended family, in constructing a genogram,. However, none of the thirty-four women contacted agreed to participate. We explored the reasons for their non-participation. We mailed a follow-up survey to all the potential participants. We made follow-up phone calls after sending a reminder letter. Twenty-seven women responded. We collated and arranged in order of frequency their reasons for non-participation.

Results

The most frequently cited reason for non-participation was that the respondent perceived her extended family to be too busy or to live too far from one another to participate. Her own sense of not feeling up to what was being asked of her was the second most frequently expressed reason, almost as often as the first.

Conclusions

The hypothesis that family physicians might improve health consciousness of Appalachian extended families by engaging them with their genogram remains untested. Testing it will require being mindful of several methodological lessons regarding recruitment of subjects, use of written materials and inclusion criteria. The researcher will be wise to adopt a collaborative, collegial approach such as employed in participatory research.

Conflict(s) of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References with DOI

1. Appalachian Regional Commission. The Appalachian Region. Available at: http://www.arc.gov/appalachian_region/TheAppalachianRegion.asp. Accessed on September 3, 2015.

2. Halverson JA. An analysis of disparities in health status and access to health care in the Appalachian region. Available at http://www.arc.gov/research/researchreportdetails.asp?REPORT_ID=82. Accessed on September 3, 2015.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic disease indicators: state/area profile. West Virginia compared with the United States. Available at:
http://www.nccd.cdc.gov/cdi Accessed on October 10, 2015.

4. Gould SJ. Health Consciousness and health behavior: the application of a new health consciousness scale. Am J Prev Med. 1990;6(4): 228-237.

5. Stephens, CC. Culturally relevant preventative health care for southern Appalachian women. 1st ed. Keefe SE, editor. Knoxville (TN): University of Knoxville Press; 2005.

6. Coyne CA, Demiean-Popescu C, Friend D. Social and cultural factors influencing health in southern West Virginia: a qualitative study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(4):1-8.

7. Francis SA, Katz ML. The HPV Vaccine: a omparison of focus groups conducted in South Africa and Ohio Appalachia. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(7): 1222-1229.

8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Surgeon General's Family Health History Initiative. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory. Accessed on October 10, 2015.

9. Rodearmel SJ, Wyatt HR, Barry MJ, Dong F, Pan D, Israel RG et al. A family-based approach to preventing excessive weight gain. Obesity. 2006;14(8):132-1401. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.158

10. Kardia SLR, Modell SM, Peyser PA. Family-centered approaches to understanding and preventing coronary heart disease. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(2):143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00587-1

11. Allerdice PW, O'Leary E, Ficken S. Updating genograms in the practice of preventive medicine. Can Fam Phys. 1988;34: 849-855.

12. Muller JH. Narrative approaches to qualitative research in primary care. 2nd ed. Crabtree BF, Miller WL ed. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1999.

13. Murphy E, Mattson B. Qualitative research and family practice: a marriage made in heaven? Fam Pract. 1992;9(1):85-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/9.1.85

14. Britten M, Jones R., Murphy E, Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. Fam Pract. 1995;12(1):104-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.104

15. Murphy J, Schwerin M, Eyerman J, Kennet J. Barriers to survey participation among older adults in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health: the importance of establishing trust. Survey Practice. 2008;1 (2).

16. Readability Formulas. The Flesch Grade Level Readability Formula. Available at: http://www.readabilityformulas.com/flesch-grade-level-readability-formula.php. Accessed on September 3, 2015.

17. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002;324:1183. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183

18. Sitzia J, Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10 (4):311-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311

19. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? So Sci Med 1995;41(12):1667-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s

Share

COinS