Introduction: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HCAHPS) has provided a standardized survey method in order to evaluate the patient’s satisfaction on the care they are provided. While overall patient satisfaction is clearly a multidimensional concept, the HCAHPS survey covers 8 domains of health care. This study tries to identify and establish the main determinants to patient’s level of satisfaction during their visit to Cabell Huntington Hospital Orthopaedics department.
Methods: Data was collected from surveys handed in 3 consecutive months; June, July and August of 2013. Sixteen questions were selected from HCAHPS that were appraised to be relevant for the use in orthopaedics department. The main dependent questions that allowed patients to rate their overall satisfaction were (1) how much is the patient likely to recommend the department is and (2) how would they rate their overall satisfaction in their visits. We then studied each of the other 14 questions (independent questions) the patients were made to answer and how much they determined the overall patient satisfaction. We also divided the questionnaire into those questions the health care provider had control over (modifiable) and those where that were not under their control (non-modifiable). Data was then gathered and step-wise multi variable regression analysis was performed. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3.
Results: 1138 patients answered the survery. The independent questions that had the maximum impact on the overall patient satisfaction was whether the nurses treated them with respect (OR = 11.5, 95% CI 3.1-43.12, pppp
Conclusion: We determined that how the nurses treat the patients and whether the doctors listened to their patients carefully had the highest impact on determining patient’s overall satisfaction and their likelihood of recommending the doctors to their relatives or friends respectively. Our study depicts the patients’ experience of their visit to the orthopedic office is dependent on a variety of factors, which can be modified by the healthcare providers in order to improve the patient’s satisfaction.
Conflict(s) of Interest
References with DOI
1. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England). 2005;27(3):281-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031
2. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2014.
3. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patientreported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value in health :the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2008;11(2):322-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x
4. Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Annals of Surgery. 2015;261(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000765
5. Kalisch BJ, Curley M, Stefanov S. An intervention to enhance nursing staff teamwork and engagement. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2007;37(2):77-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200702000-00010
6. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359(18):1921-31. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0804116
7. Marshall GN, Hays RD, Mazel R. Health status and satisfaction with health care: results from the medical outcomes study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1996;64(2):380-90. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.64.2.380
8. Clark PA, Leddy K, Drain M, Kaldenberg D. State nursing shortages and patient satisfaction: more RNs--better patient experiences. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2007;22(2):119-27;quiz 28-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ncq.0000263100.29181.e3
9. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012;172(5):405-11. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662
10. Giordano LA, Elliott MN, Goldstein E, Lehrman WG, Spencer PA. Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey. Medical Care Research and Review. 2010;67(1):27-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558709341065
11. Bickell NA, Neuman J, Fei K, Franco R, Joseph KA. Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(15):1791-5. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.7605
12. Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M. The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Medical Care. 1997;35(7):714-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199707000-00005
13. Daly R. Unsatisfactory marks. Hospitals question use of HCAHPS in scoring for value-based purchasing. Modern Healthcare. 2011;41(33):30.
14. Goldstein E, Elliott MN, Lehrman WG, Hambarsoomian K, Giordano LA. Racial/ethnic differences in patients’ perceptions of inpatient care using the HCAHPS survey. Medical Care Research and Review. 2010;67(1):74-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558709341066
Modarresi, Milad; Qureshi, Ammar; Aguilar, Rodrigo; Anderson, Meghan; and Cheung, Felix
"Optimizing quality of care by patient satisfaction for the department of Orthopaedics - A survey study,"
Marshall Journal of Medicine:
4, Article 9.
Available at: https://mds.marshall.edu/mjm/vol4/iss4/9