Date of Award

2026

Degree Name

Leadership Studies

College

College of Education and Professional Development

Type of Degree

Ed.D.

Document Type

Dissertation

First Advisor

Dr. Eugenia Lambert

Second Advisor

Dr. Bobbi Nicholson

Third Advisor

Dr. Jason Gorgia

Abstract

This qualitative study examined how BIPOC and LGBTQ+ educators describe their experiences navigating curriculum restrictions and book bans in politically restrictive educational environments, their perceptions of administrator support, and how their identities uniquely shape their decisions about resistance and risk. Grounded in Scott’s theory of everyday resistance, the study explored the ways BIPOC and LGBTQ+ educators make decisions about resistance when curricular content connected to race, gender, sexuality, and marginalized identities is challenged or restricted. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with educators who identify as BIPOC and/or LGBTQ+, allowing participants to describe their experiences, decision-making processes, perceived risks, and understandings of professional responsibility. Findings suggested that educators’ responses to curriculum restrictions were shaped by concerns for student protection and commitments to educational equity. Administrator response was related to the visibility of resistance more than to whether resistance existed at all. Participants described resistance not only as overt opposition, but also as subtle, strategic, and protective acts intended to preserve inclusive learning environments while minimizing risk to themselves and harm to their students. Themes included visibility as resistance, strategic self-regulation under surveillance, and intellectual resistance through pedagogy. Participants also shared their perceptions of invisibility, disparate emotional burdens, and the disingenuousness of those implementing restrictions. This study contributes to research on curriculum censorship and BIPOC and LGBTQ+ educators’ experiences by highlighting how resistance is enacted in everyday professional practice. Implications for practice align with Scott’s assessment of the potential for aggregate impact of these “weapons of the weak.”

Subject(s)

Education.

Educational leadership.

Education and state.

Minorities.

Ethnic groups.

Sexual minorities.

Censorship.

Education -- Curricula.

Educational law and legislation.

Intellectual freedom.

Teachers -- Political activity.

Government, Resistance to.

Social action.

Academic freedom.

Educational change.

Minority teachers.

Sexual minority teachers.

Von Stein.pdf (105 kB)
von stein 2.pdf (242 kB)

Share

COinS