Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Fall 2017
Abstract
In this project, I argue that J. Edgar Hoover’s style of political realism should be studied by critics because it long preceded that of President Harry S. Truman. Thestyle belonged to a stockpile of anti-Communist imagery that helped to shape how the Truman Doctrine speech was drafted and how audiences interpreted its meanings in more local domestic politics. When Truman fınally announced that the Soviet Union had challenged international protocol, I argue that he confırmed the vision that his Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director and other detractors had developed throughout the New Deal to discredit reformers who challenged issues of race, labor, and police technique. In this way, anti-Communist containment rhetoric limited the president’s ability to control the domestic security and economic agendas. The stockpile of anti-Communist discourse belonged to, I also argue, a relative of political realism—literary realism and its spinoff, literary naturalism.My fınal argument is that the FBI director refurbished key tropes in the stockpile,which helped Truman’s congressional opponents invoke Hoover’s authority within the executive branch and thereby displace the president’s credibility as commander in chief. Combined, Hoover and his allies in Congress and elsewhere used rhetorical realism to communicate a deterministic philosophy about human nature through a diffuse mythic narrative, coordinated between Congress, Hollywood, the press, and offıcial FBI discourse.
Recommended Citation
Underhill, Stephen M. "Prisoner of Context: The Truman Doctrine Speech and J. Edgar Hoover’s Rhetorical Realism." Rhetoric & Public Affairs 20.3 (2017): 453-487.
Comments
The copy of record is available at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/677427/summary.
Copyright © 2017 Michigan State University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.