Date of Award

2005

Degree Name

English

College

College of Liberal Arts

Type of Degree

M.A.

Document Type

Thesis

First Advisor

John Young

Second Advisor

Gwenyth Hood

Third Advisor

Kateryna Schray

Abstract

By examining both William Caxton’s edition and the Winchester manuscript of Malory’s King Arthur tales, readers can begin to understand the editorial theory issues associated with these dissimilar texts. Questions concerning authorial intention, final intention, versions, and scholarly editing arise as scholars and readers try to negotiate which is the better version. However, each version offers advantages and disadvantages of Malory’s work, culminating in the need for both versions to exist and to be studied.

Subject(s)

Editorial theory and literary criticism.

Malory, Thomas, Sir, 15th cent. Morte d'Arthur.

Share

COinS