Abdominal and pelvic abscesses can occur as a consequence of surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is well accepted that the primary treatment is antibiotic therapy and minimally invasive drainage. Surgical measures are typically reserved for patients with luminal perforations or those who do not respond to conservative measures. Previously available modalities of drainage involved percutaneous and computed tomography guided access. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound guided aspiration has emerged as a safe alternative for management of intra-abdominal abscesses.

Since its first application for peripancreatic drainage, endoscopic ultrasound techniques and technologies have significantly evolved. Endoscopic ultrasound interventions can now be performed quickly, safely and precisely, even outside of the operating room.

Multiple reports and case series demonstrate the utility for endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of fluid collections, providing they are in close proximity to the intestinal lumen. As a result, extension of this approach’s indications has been considered.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and stenting is an emerging approach which provides an accurate, efficient and safe alternative for the management of intra-abdominal collections. Furthermore, endoscopic ultrasound techniques may allow access to areas that are inaccessible or technically challenging with computed tomography guided or surgical approaches as illustrated in our case. Additionally, the internal nature of the access point may offer patients a more comfortable experience; and can facilitate preservation of enteral feeding routes or intestinal transit.

This case demonstrated the clinical complexity that often characterizes the management of post surgical complications, particularly inflammatory collections. It further delineates the utility of Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration techniques in the treatment of pelvic abscesses, even as a salvage therapy, where other approaches fail. EUS guided drainage should strongly be considered at multiple tiers of all treatment algorithms as a viable, and in some instances preferable therapeutic modality for patients presenting with intra-abdominal collections.

Conflict(s) of Interest


References with DOI

1. Ryan S, McGrath FP, Haslam PJ, Varghese JC, Lee MJ. Ultrasound-guided endocavitary drainage of pelvic abscesses: technique, results and complications. Clin. Radiol. 2003;58: 75–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2003.1148

2. Ramesh J, Bang JY, Trevino J, Varadarajulu S. Comparison of outcomes between endoscopic ultrasound-guided transcolonic and transrectal drainage of abdominopelvic abscesses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):620-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12081

3. Varadarajulu S, Drelichman ER. Effectiveness of EUS in drainage of pelvic abscesses in 25 consecutive patients(with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009;70: 1121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.034

4. Giovannini M, Bories E, Moutardier V, et al. Drainage of deep pelvic abscesses using therapeutic echo endoscopy. Endoscopy 2003;35: 511–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39673

5. Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Seitz JF. Cystogastrotomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst: results in six patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:200-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70165-8

6. Vilmann P, Hancke S, Pless T, Schell-Hincke JD, Henriksen FW. One-step endosonography- guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst: a new technique of stent delivery through the echo endoscope. Endoscopy 1998; 30:730–733. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1001399

7. Kahaleh M, Wang P, Shami VM, Tokar J, Yeaton P. Drainage of gallbladder fossa fluid collections with endoprosthesis placement under endoscopic ultrasound guidance: a preliminary report of two cases. Endoscopy 2005; 37:393–396. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-860998

8. Lee DH, Cash BD, Womeldorph CM, Horwhat JD. Endoscopic therapy of a splenic abscess: definitive treatment via EUS-guided transgastric drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:631–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.031

9. Shami VM, Talreja JP, Mahajan A, Phillips MS, Yeaton P, Kahaleh M. EUS-guided drainage of bilomas: a new alternative? Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040

10. Piraka C, Shah RJ, Fukami N, Chathadi KV, Chen YK. EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):786-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.049

11.Ulla-Rocha JL, Vilar-Cao Z, Sardina-Ferreiro R. EUS-guided drainage and stent placement for postoperative intra-abdominal and pelvic fluid collections in oncological surgery. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;5(2):95-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283x11427420

12. Wehrmann T, Stergiou N, Voyel B, Riphaus A, Köckerling F, Frenz MB. Endoscopic debridement of paraesophageal mediastinal abscesses: a prospective case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3671(08)70404-x