•  
  •  
 

Author Credentials

Ahmed Amro, MD, Shahed Elhamdani, MS2, Alaa Gabi, MD, Haytham Aljoudi, MD, Mehiar El-Hamdani, MD, FACC, FSCAI

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.18590/mjm.2016.vol2.iss4.8

Abstract

Introduction:

We are presenting three cases (out of similar several cases) where tibio-pedal approach was performed as an initial primary approach for limb salvage in patients with CLI secondary to Infra-popliteal (IP) disease. We consider this approach to be a necessary evolution in endovascular intervention.

Discussion:

Retrograde pedal access is safe, feasible with high technical success rate and a relatively low procedural complication rate, with low 30 days mortality and low rate of major adverse cardiac events. Freedom from major adverse limb events and limb salvage are both high at 1 year follow up. It allows quick therapy and short procedure time with less observation time in the hospital. A retrograde approach utilizing pedal access improves the crossing success of lesions as well as facilitates the use of some atherectomy devices to remove large plaque burden and modify the compliance of severely calcified infra-popliteal vessels. Using the retrograde approach will minimize the classic complications of the antegrade femoral approach.

Conclusion:

Retrograde tibio-pedal arterial access, as an initial primary approach for endovascular intervention in CLI patients confined to IP vessels, is an effective, safe, and feasible approach with a high technical success rate and a relatively low procedural complication rate.

Conflict(s) of Interest

NONE

References with DOI

1. Nehler MR, Duval S, Diao L, Annex BH, Hiatt WR, Rogers K, et al. Epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia in an insured national population. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(3):686-95 e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.290

2. Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992;6 Suppl A:1-32.

3. Fernandez N, McEnaney R, Marone LK, Rhee RY, Leers S, Makaroun M, et al. Predictors of failure and success of tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4):834-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.070

4. Gray BH, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Dieter RS, Jaff MR, White CJ. SCAI expert consensus statement for infrapopliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(4):539-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25395

5. Gray BH, Grant AA, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW, Langan EM, 3rd, Taylor SA, et al. The impact of isolated tibial disease on outcomes in the critical limb ischemic population. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(3):349-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.034

6. Dobrow EM, Mittleider D. Retrograde tibiopedal access for the treatment of critical limb ischemia. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18(2):66-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2015.04.003

7. Aboyans V, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Salazar J, Criqui MH, Laskar M. The general prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease differs according to the disease localization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(9):898-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.055

8. Sadek M, Ellozy SH, Turnbull IC, Lookstein RA, Marin ML, Faries PL. Improved outcomes are associated with multilevel endovascular intervention involving the tibial vessels compared with isolated tibial intervention. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(3):638-43; discussion 43-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.021

9. Fernandez N, McEnaney R, Marone LK, Rhee RY, Leers S, Makaroun M, et al. Multilevel versus isolated endovascular tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(3):722-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.232

10. Mustapha JA, Diaz-Sandoval LJ. Balloon angioplasty in tibioperoneal interventions for patients with critical limb ischemia. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;17(3):183-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2014.08.007

11. Spinosa DJ, Leung DA, Harthun NL, Cage DL, Fritz Angle J, Hagspiel KD, et al. Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access for subintimal recanalization of peripheral arterial occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(11):1449-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000096764.74047.21

12. Botti CF, Jr., Ansel GM, Silver MJ, Barker BJ, South S. Percutaneous retrograde tibial access in limb salvage. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10(3):614-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152660280301000330

13. El-Sayed H, Bennett ME, Loh TM, Davies MG. Retrograde pedal access and endovascular revascularization: a safe and effective technique for high-risk patients with complex tibial vessel disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;31:91-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.09.015

14. Walker CM, Mustapha J, Zeller T, Schmidt A, Montero-Baker M, Nanjundappa A, et al. Tibiopedal access for crossing of infrainguinal artery occlusions: a prospective multicenter observational study. J Endovasc Ther. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602816664768

15. Montero-Baker M, Schmidt A, Braunlich S, Ulrich M, Thieme M, Biamino G, et al. Retrograde approach for complex popliteal and tibioperoneal occlusions. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15(5):594-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/08-2440.1

16. Bazan HA, Le L, Donovan M, Sidhom T, Smith TA, Sternbergh WC, 3rd. Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):375-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.038

17. Kwan TW, Shah S, Amoroso N, Diwan R, Makker P, Ratcliffe JA, et al. Feasibility and safety of routine transpedal arterial access for treatment of peripheral artery disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27(7):327-30.