Mode of Program Participation
Academic Scholarship
Participation Type
Paper
Presentation #1 Title
MOUNTAIN RESISTANCE: APPALACHIAN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN CRITICAL LEGAL RESEARCH MODELED LAW REFORM
Presentation #1 Abstract or Summary
John Rawls authored the modern seminal work on civil disobedience in A Theory of Justice. Like all Rawlsian political theory, civil disobedience is very much conceived vis-à-vis the liberalism paradigm. Through this restrictive lens, the role of civil disobedience is in communicating injustices to legal-institutional elites, who thereafter effect intra-systemic change (i.e., based on the normative pleas of disobedients). This Article, however, rejects the Rawlsian liberalist model, instead adopting a critical legal theory based approach to civil disobedience. The role of civil disobedience via critical thought is not in communicating to societal elites—but rather in “promulgating” self-law through collective contestation and self-determination. Thus imbued with third and fourth wave critical theory, civil disobedience is re-visioned as a grassroots sociopolitical end and not as a mere communicative means towards reform. This Article discusses critically informed civil disobedience in the specific context of the critical legal research movement (“CLR”). Dedicated equally to intra-systemic and systemic (i.e., institutional-transformative) reform, CLR is a nascent, proceduralist-based school that aims to effect change via radical approaches to legal research and analysis. Core CLR practices are as follows: (1) The deconstruction of the commercial legal research regime, which facilitates the unpacking of unjust doctrine; (2) a newfound practitioner reliance upon critical based, theoretical resources for doctrinal reconstruction, and; (3) the incorporation of grassroots activists into progressive reform initiatives. As an expansionist project, this Article examines the role of critically informed civil disobedience in part (3) of the CLR model, demonstrating that transformative doctrinal and systemic change may best be achieved through the egalitarian cultivation of the civil disobedient work product. Civil disobedients—not reformist-minded attorneys or theoreticians—occupy the privileged reform space in this novel framework. In linking theory to concrete reality, Appalachian civil disobedience practices are utilized as the case model for this Article. Civil disobedience is often a sole contestatory means available to the structurally subordinated Appalachian demos, which has suffered interminably at the hands of extractive industries and a captured ruling elite. Mountaintop removal mining, a singularly destructive practice, has long been contested by both disobedients and legal-institutional reformers; recently, momentous mountaintop removal change has at last occurred. This Article demonstrates that by incorporating Appalachian civil disobedients into continued surface mining and related reformist projects (e.g., comprehensive coal site reclamation, hydraulic fracturing reform, broader Appalachian development work, etc.), we may best succeed in crafting both procedurally just and maximally effective transformative change for the region.
At-A-Glance Bio- Presenter #1
Nicholas F. Stump is a Library Faculty Member and the Assistant Director for Instructional & Public Services at West Virginia College of Law, where he administers and teaches in the legal research curriculum. Professor Stump’s scholarship focuses on the intersection of environmental law, Appalachian studies, critical legal theory, and critically-informed approaches to legal research and analysis.
MOUNTAIN RESISTANCE: APPALACHIAN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN CRITICAL LEGAL RESEARCH MODELED LAW REFORM
John Rawls authored the modern seminal work on civil disobedience in A Theory of Justice. Like all Rawlsian political theory, civil disobedience is very much conceived vis-à-vis the liberalism paradigm. Through this restrictive lens, the role of civil disobedience is in communicating injustices to legal-institutional elites, who thereafter effect intra-systemic change (i.e., based on the normative pleas of disobedients). This Article, however, rejects the Rawlsian liberalist model, instead adopting a critical legal theory based approach to civil disobedience. The role of civil disobedience via critical thought is not in communicating to societal elites—but rather in “promulgating” self-law through collective contestation and self-determination. Thus imbued with third and fourth wave critical theory, civil disobedience is re-visioned as a grassroots sociopolitical end and not as a mere communicative means towards reform. This Article discusses critically informed civil disobedience in the specific context of the critical legal research movement (“CLR”). Dedicated equally to intra-systemic and systemic (i.e., institutional-transformative) reform, CLR is a nascent, proceduralist-based school that aims to effect change via radical approaches to legal research and analysis. Core CLR practices are as follows: (1) The deconstruction of the commercial legal research regime, which facilitates the unpacking of unjust doctrine; (2) a newfound practitioner reliance upon critical based, theoretical resources for doctrinal reconstruction, and; (3) the incorporation of grassroots activists into progressive reform initiatives. As an expansionist project, this Article examines the role of critically informed civil disobedience in part (3) of the CLR model, demonstrating that transformative doctrinal and systemic change may best be achieved through the egalitarian cultivation of the civil disobedient work product. Civil disobedients—not reformist-minded attorneys or theoreticians—occupy the privileged reform space in this novel framework. In linking theory to concrete reality, Appalachian civil disobedience practices are utilized as the case model for this Article. Civil disobedience is often a sole contestatory means available to the structurally subordinated Appalachian demos, which has suffered interminably at the hands of extractive industries and a captured ruling elite. Mountaintop removal mining, a singularly destructive practice, has long been contested by both disobedients and legal-institutional reformers; recently, momentous mountaintop removal change has at last occurred. This Article demonstrates that by incorporating Appalachian civil disobedients into continued surface mining and related reformist projects (e.g., comprehensive coal site reclamation, hydraulic fracturing reform, broader Appalachian development work, etc.), we may best succeed in crafting both procedurally just and maximally effective transformative change for the region.
