•  
  •  
 

DOI

https://dx.doi.org/10.18590/euscorpius.2015.vol2015.iss213.1

Abstract

Chaerilus granulatus sp. n. and C. longimanus sp. n. from Vietnam are described and compared with other species of the genus. Both species are characterized by: median eyes present; movable finger of pedipalp with 7–9 rows of granules; total length of adults under 30 mm; male differing from female in having pedipalp chela much narrower and longer. The two new species are differentiated by: ventral sides of sternite VII are smooth in C. longimanus sp. n. and granulated in C. granulatus sp. n. Adults of both sexes of C. granulatus sp. n. and C. hofereki Kovařík et al., 2014 were raised from birth and their exuviae were retained and compared to the mature adults. Hemisper-matophores of C. granulatus sp. n. and C. hofereki were extracted and illustrated. Karyotype of male holotype of C. granulatus sp. n. consists of high number of chromosomes (2n=96).

References with DOI

BASTAWADE, D. B. 1994. A study of hemispermatophores in Indian scorpions of the families Chaerilidae, Vaejovidae and Ischnuridae. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 94(2-4): 435–437.

FET, V. 2000. Family Chaerilidae Pocock, 1893. Pp. 323–328 in Fet, V., W.D. Sissom, G. Lowe & M.E. Braunwalder. 2000. Catalog of the Scorpions of the World (1758–1998). New York: The New York Entomological Society, 689 pp.

FRANCKE, O. F. & W. D. SISSOM. 1984. Comparative review of the methods used to determine the number of molts to maturity in scorpions (Arachnida), with analysis of the post-birth development of Vaejovis coalhuilae Williams (Vaejovidae). Journal of Arachnology, 12:1–20.

KOVAŘÍK, F. 2009. Illustrated catalog of scorpions. Part I. Introductory remarks; keys to families and genera; subfamily Scorpioninae with keys to Heterometrus and Pandinus species. Clairon Production, Prague, 170 pp.

KOVAŘÍK, F., O. KOŠULIČ, F. ŠŤÁHLAVSKÝ, J. PLÍŠKOVÁ, W. DONGKHAMFU & P. WONGPROM. 2015. Two new species of Euscorpiops Vachon, 1980 from Thailand and Myanmar (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae: Scorpiopinae). Annales Zoologici, 65: 109–122. https://doi.org/10.3161/00034541anz2015.65.1.009

KOVAŘÍK F., J. KRÁL, T. KOŘÍNKOVÁ & A. C. REYES LERMA 2014. Chaerilus hofereki sp. n. from Vietnam (Scorpiones, Chaerilidae). Euscorpius, 189: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18590/euscorpius.2014.vol2014.iss189.1

KOVAŘÍK, F & A. A. OJANGUREN AFFILASTRO. 2013. Illustrated catalog of scorpions Part II. Bothriuridae; Chaerilidae; Buthidae I., genera Compsobuthus, Hottentotta, Isometrus, Lychas, and Sassanidotus. Prague: Clairon Production, 400 pp.

KRAEPELIN, K. 1899. Scorpiones und Pedipalpi. In Dahl, F. (ed.), Das Tierreich. Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft. Berlin: R. Friedländer und Sohn Verlag, 8. Lieferung, 265 pp.

LOURENÇO, W. R. 2002. Nouvelles données sur la morphologie et la biogéographie des Microcharmus Lourenço avec confirmation de la validité des Microcharmidae (Chelicerata, Scorpiones). Biogeographica, 78(1): 35–47.

LOURENÇO W. R. & B. DUHEM. 2010. The genus Chaerilus Simon, 1877 (Scorpiones, Chaerilidae) in the Himalayas and description of a new species. ZooKeys, 37: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.37.369

POCOCK, R. I. 1890. Description of a new genus and species of scorpion belonging to the group Jurini. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6(5): 250– 252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939009460822

POCOCK, R. I. 1893. Notes on the classification of scorpions, followed by some observations upon synonymy, with descriptions of new genera and species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6(12): 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939308677626

SIMON, E. 1877. Études Arachnologiques. Part X. Arachnides nouveaux et peu connus. Annales de la Sociéte Entomologique de France, 5(7): 225–242.

SISSOM, W. D. 1990. Systematics, biogeography and paleontology. Pp. 64–160 in: Polis, G. A. (ed.) The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

SOLEGLAD, M. E. & V. FET. 2003a. The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni). Euscorpius, 5: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.18590/euscorpius.2003.vol2003.iss5.1

SOLEGLAD, M. E. & V. FET. 2003b. High-level systematics and phylogeny of the extant scorpions (Scorpiones: Orthosterni). Euscorpius, 11: 1–175. https://doi.org/10.18590/euscorpius.2003.vol2003.iss11.1

STOCKWELL, S. A. 1989. Revision of the Phylogeny and Higher Classification of Scorpions (Chelicerata). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Berkeley, Berkeley, California. 319 pp. (unpublished). University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

STAHNKE, H. L. 1971. Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. Entomological News, 81: 297–316.

THORELL, T. 1889. Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmanie e regioni vicine. XXI. – Aracnidi Artrogastri Birmani raccolti da L. Fea nel 1885–1887. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 27: 521–729.

VACHON, M. 1974. Études des caractères utilisés pour classer les familles et les genres des scorpions (Arachnides). 1. La trichobothriotaxie en arachnologie. Sigles trichobothriaux et types de trichobothriotaxie chez les Scorpions. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 3e série, 140 (Zoologie, 104): 857–958.

Share

COinS